Why Use a 1b (Intent to Use) Filing Basis on a Trademark Application?
Constructive Use Benefits
A 1(b) trademark applicant has the benefit of Constructive Use of the trademark as of the filing date of the application for priority purposes. Contingent on registration of the mark on the Principle Register, the filing of the 1(b) application to register constitutes “constructive use” of the mark, conferring “a right of priority, nationwide in effect” subject to the following exceptions.
Except for a person whose mark has not been abandoned and who, prior to such filing—
(1) has used the mark;
(2) has filed an application to register the mark which is pending or has resulted in registration of the mark; or
(3) has filed a foreign application to register the mark on the basis of which he or she has acquired a right of priority, and timely files an application under section 44(d) to register the mark which is pending or has resulted in registration of the mark.
A 1(b) intent-
Like a 1(a) filer (already in use in commerce), the user of a 1(b) USPTO trademark application (highlighted in the declaration below) makes a declaration (see below) regarding the planned use of the trademark and the user’s rights in that trademark and makes a sworn declaration that “that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or submission or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.”
* No use of mark yet may mean that the applicant is using the commerce in commerce but not claiming use in commerce yet for some reason. An applicant is not required to submit under 1(a) if the mark in already in use. There are some possible advantages (not an exhaustive list) to having a 1(b) application: by filing a Section 1(b) application, an applicant can ensure that no use-
Even an applicant filing without an attorney needs to take this declaration very seriously. “[The] fact that [an] applicant filed the application without the assistance of counsel did not give applicant a free pass to disregard the straightforward requests of a use based application [1(a)] and the solemnity of the application declaration.” § 3:180 Fraud on the PTO, Trademark Trial & App. Board Prac. & Proc.
Taking Advantage of Constructive Use
An applicant with a 1(b) application has the right to oppose a later filed application in an opposition and in this opposition, rely on the filing date of the 1(b) application as a priority date.
A 1(b) or ITU applicant can file up to five extensions of time of six months each. This time, plus the first six months after a Notice of Allowance, can give up to three years of time to submit an Allegation of Use/Statement of Use. Efforts made toward using the mark in commerce must be continuing to submit a request for an extension of time past the first request. Efforts to use the mark in commerce may include product or service research or development, market research, manufacturing activities, promotional activities, steps to acquire distributors, steps to obtain required governmental approval, or other similar activities, such as efforts to secure funding.
Examples of activities that would not be acceptable to show good cause include physical illness or disability and lack of staff and resources due to economic downturn.
What is an Allegation of Use?
An Allegation of Use is a sworn statement signed by the applicant or a person authorized to sign on behalf of the applicant attesting to use of the mark in commerce. (Since most trademarks are now filed electronically, this is usually an electronic signature.) With the Allegation of Use, the owner must submit:
When do I file an Allegation of Use? During one of the two windows of opportunity.
You may file the Allegation of Use only on or before the day the examining attorney (window 1) approves the mark for publication in the Official Gazette or on or after the day the USPTO (window 2) issues the Notice of Allowance.
This first window of opportunity (Window 1) is on or before the status of the application in the USPTO's TSDR database changes to “Approved for Publication.” An Allegation of Use filed before the mark is approved for publication is called an Amendment to Allege Use (AAU).
This second window of opportunity (Window 2) is on or after the status of the application in the USPTO's TSDR database changes to “Notice of Allowance.” An Allegation of Use filed after the Notice of Allowance is issued is called a Statement of Use (SOU).
The Amendment to Allege Use (AAU) and the Statement of Use (SOU) include the same information and differ only as to the time when it is filed. If you file an Allegation of Use between the period after the mark is approved for publication but before the Notice of Allowance is issued (called the “blackout period”), the USPTO will return it (not accept it).
In the above explanation, Window 1 is approximately three months (from application to examination) if there are no office actions. This is the initial processing time between when the application is filed and when it is “Approved for Publication.” Window 2 is six months plus any additional time that is applied for in an Extension Request(s).
Is there a deadline for filing the Statement of Use after the Notice of Allowance issues?
Yes. Once the USPTO issues the Notice of Allowance, you have six (6) months to file the Statement of Use. The six-
What is a Request for an Extension of Time to file a Statement of Use?
An Extension Request is a sworn statement signed by the owner or a person authorized to sign on behalf of the owner, stating that the applicant still has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce, and needs additional time to use the mark in commerce. A filing fee of $125 per class of goods/services must accompany the Extension Request. The form for filing the Extension Request is available at http://www.uspto.gov/teas/index.html. A sample of the form (not for filing) is found here SAMPLE EXTENSION REQUEST (PDF) .
The Extension Request, if granted, gives the owner an additional six (6) months (computed in six month increments from the Notice of Allowance date) to either:
You may continue to file Extension Requests every six (6) months for a total of five extensions allowed. However, you must use the mark and file a Statement of Use within three (3) years of the date the Notice of Allowance issues. The USPTO will not register a mark if, after thirty-
WARNING USING A Statement of Use INSTEAD OF AN AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE CAN BE RISKY: Unlike with an Amendment to Allege Use filed before an application has been approved for publication [this comes before the mark is Published for Opposition], the applicant may not withdraw a Statement of Use (SOU) filed after a Notice of Allowance has been issued if the SOU fails to meet the statutory requirements. 37 C.F.R. §2.88(g); TMEP 1109.17. A specimen refusal after Notice of Allowance is a very common reason that trademark applications go abandoned.
However, the applicant may file one “insurance” extension request with the SOU, or afterwards, in the limited situation where time remains in the existing six-
Should you file a 1(a) or a 1(b) filing basis? Depends on the facts! Having a strategy based on facts rather than just filling out a form should get a better result.
EMAIL us at W@Tmk.law with questions or call 1-
TM1b.com
(Trademark 1b)
DECLARATION Read the following statements before signing. Acknowledge the statements by checking the boxes and signing below. □Basis: If the applicant is filing the application based on use in commerce under 15 U.S.C. § 1051(a):
AND/OR If the applicant is filing the application based on an intent to use the mark in commerce under 15 U.S.C. § 1051(b), § 1126(d), and/or § 1126(e):
□To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive. □To the best of the signatory's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances, the allegations and other factual contentions made above have evidentiary support. □The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or submission or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true. |
TMk®
Not Just Patents®
Aim Higher® Facts Matter
W@TMK.law best or
1-
(Calls are screened for ‘trademark’ and other applicable reasons for the call)
TMk® Email W@TMK.law best or call 1- For more information from Not Just Patents, see our other pages and sites: |
|
Are You a Content Provider- |
|
Trademark Register FAQ Definition: Clearance Search teas plus vs teas standard approved for pub - |
Amend to Supplemental Register? |
|
|
ID of Goods and Services see also Headings (list) of International Trademark Classes How to search ID Manual |
How to TESS trademark search- |
Likelihood of confusion- |
|
Published for Opposition What is Discoverable in a TTAB Proceeding Affirmative Defenses |
|
What is the Difference between Principal & Supplemental Register? |
What is a Family of Marks? What If Someone Files An Opposition Against My Trademark? Statutory Cause of Action (aka Standing) |
©2008- Email: W@TMK.law. This site is for informational purposes only and is provided without warranties, express or implied, regarding the information's accuracy, timeliness, or completeness and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney/client relationship exists without a written contract between Not Just Patents LLC and its client. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Privacy Policy Contact Us
|